Loose ends: a Liminal mini-campaign (and some thoughts on Liminal)

I didn’t mean to run a Liminal mini-campaign. My original plan was to run Prodigal Son and The Haunting, to a) try running someone else’s adventure, and b) to try my hand at Liminal.

But the players were enjoying their characters and had questions about their backstories and I didn’t want to run more one-shots without exploring that. I also wanted to draw it all to a close (because I don’t like extended campaigns).

So this is what I did. (Click here if you’d like to see the Trello board we used. I’ve moved some of the GM-facing bits over that the players didn’t see—I originally had them on a separate board and only copied them over when I needed to.)

Loose ends

We had a fair number of loose ends after Prodigal Son and The Haunting. These included:

• What was Charles Gardner up to?
• What was Ariadne doing with the knife?
• Where was Mark Northcott?
• What was going to happen with Sir Tatton Northcott’s library?

And that’s not including the questions in the character backstories:

• Who were Ygraine’s parents?
• What had Naomi’s mentor done? And where was he?
• Who had destroyed Stephen’s pack in the Lake District?

Focussing on the characters

So rather than give the characters cases to solve, I created problems for the characters to deal with while I worked out a narrative that linked their backgrounds together. Here’s what I decided:

• Naomi: Naomi’s mentor (Dr Belnap) was secretly a member of the Shrivelled Rose (mentioned in passing on Liminal p.210), seeking their own twisted vision of human perfection.
• Ygraine: Ygraine’s parents were a high-ranking politician’s wife and a Fae of Queen of Hyde Park’s Court. However, her mother had actually been taken by the Winter King and was trapped in his realm.
• Stephen: Stephen’s pack had been killed by Dr Belnap (assisted by Charles Gardner and a crazy vampire called Suzy Shrike) and then experimented on as part of the Shrivelled Rose’s plans.
• Aaron: The vampire that set Aaron on his dark journey and into the Liminal world was Suzy Shrike (Charles Gardner’s associate).

Problems problems

Some of the problems the players faced:

• The ambitious vampire Ariadne (from Prodigal Son) approached Stephen with information about the murder of his pack. In exchange, Ariadne wanted Stephen to show her how the knife of Lethe works…
• Sir Tatton Northcott left his library (and a peculiar cabinet) to Naomi in his will. However, the Council of Merlin approached Naomi and suggested that it would be good for her if she gave them the library instead. But the players don’t trust the council…
• Having experienced two ghost realms (in Prodigal Son and The Haunting), the Crew decide to hide the library in another ghost realm in Leeds. They find a potential realm near the City Varieties music hall, but how to get into it?
•  Becoming trapped in a ghost realm at Hardknott Fort and rescuing innocent bystanders from the winged horrors hidden within. (I wrote this up as an encounter here.)

My preparation for each session was to create a list of events and moments that I thought might happen, or that I might introduce to complicate things. I tracked these using a checklist in Trello (on my GM board), which I found worked really well. (At the end of each session I asked the players what they might want to follow up on, which gave me something to plan.)

At the end of one session the players asked if I knew what they would do. I told them I had no idea—but that I had created a situation (populated with people, things and events), and then I simply reacted to their actions. While I had an overall direction in mind for the things I knew they were interested in, I had no sense what they would do from scene to scene.

Colourful characters and unpleasant artefacts

I created numerous NPCs for the PCs to interact with. These included:

• Holly Greenwood—Fae owner of a crystal shop opposite City Varieties in the centre of Leeds.
• Tiberius—an immortal Roman legionary (“I don’t know why I’m so old; I just haven’t died yet.”) and living in the Lake District.
• Karen White—fearless reporter on the trail of our heroes.
• Jurgen Heim—dark wizard, er I mean evil wizard of the Shrivelled Rose.
• Ethel Beardsley—the nun with a gun.
• Hannah Smith—PhD student who took a shine to one of our heroes.
• Suzy Shrike—the crazy vampire who sleeps in a coffin of dirt.
• Dr Cartilage—Edinburgh’s ineffectual Council of Merlin representative.
• Creepy kids—in the fae world (these had no stats or anything—just a photo of the Midwich Cuckoos and the description “creepy kids” on their Trello card).
• A lazy, video-game-playing and junk-food eating (and ensorcelled) fae lord.

Not all of my NPCs entered play, but that’s okay as I’m sure they will appear in another game one day.

I’ve been creating weird and unpleasant artefacts for Tales of Terror for years, so it was inevitable that some would find their way into Liminal.

• 

  The card for the creepy tooth egg

  Gideon Stem’s cabinet of homunculi
• A ghost bottle (created just for the game)
• Dr John Dee’s skull signet ring
• An egg made of human teeth, with a heartbeat. (This was a fae court, magically imprisoned by the Shrivelled Rose. Maybe I should write a Tale of Terror about that.)

I did these with cards on the Trello board, with a description and a photo. The players had access to the Trello, and they also added details or photos, which was great.

The players seemed to enjoy running around the “real” world. We used Google Maps when scouting locations, including City Varieties in Leeds, Hardknott Roman Fort, Holyrood Park in Edinburgh. That’s one of the things I like about a modern-day game—the detail is limitless.

Wrapping it up

The mini-campaign ended up in a fae domain that the Shrivelled Rose had corrupted. The main access was in the garage of an industrial unit, which the Crew sneaked into (excellent usage of the False Face glamour trait—Liminal’s version of Polyjuice potion).

The domain itself I modelled on Cragside, the National Trust property in Rothwell. The house was occupied by the fae lord of the realm (a lazy chap corrupted by the dark wizards from the Shrivelled Rose), while the stable block contained the laboratories—and a nursery away in the woods.

Final encounters

With their base in the fae realm exposed by the Crew, the Shrivelled Rose decided to make a hasty retreat. The Crew released the fae lord from his ensorcellment, freed his court from their tooth-egg prison, and stopped the Shrivelled Rose from escaping.

We satisfyingly conclude most of the character arcs:

• Stephen avenged the death of his pack by killing both Dr Belnap and Charles Gardner.
• Naomi cleared her name with the Council of Merlin by exposing her mentor’s crimes.
• Aaron faced Suzy Shrike and is accepted into P Division.

And Ygraine? Ygraine learned that her mother was one of the Winter King’s brides, and set off in search of answers…

About Liminal

As for Liminal itself, I never found myself completely comfortable with the rules and too often I wished that I was using Fate Accelerated instead. Often I made something up whenever we hit a grey area, and we seemed to hit those regularly. It’s not that Liminal is complicated, but it is just complex enough that we spent more time consulting the rules than I prefer.

I still prefer a looser ruleset that I can handwave, and when it came to creating winged horrors that attacked the PCs in a ghost realm at Hardknott Fort, I ignored traits and abilities and simply decided on the effects I wanted.

Liminal’s core concept

There’s something that bugs me about Liminal’s core concept though. In Liminal the PCs investigate mysteries. The difference between Liminal and other investigative roleplaying games is that the player characters are “liminals”, someone between both the Hidden World and the real world. (Liminal’s core concept is not explained until page 63 which describes what the PCs do in the game.)

Liminal comes with a good selection of character concepts (gutter mage, eldritch scholar, changeling, and so on) and the four pregenerated characters described above.

However.

All the pregens are misfits, fitting neither in the ordinary nor the Hidden World. They all have different reasons for that and they encapsulate the concept of being “liminal”. But many of the character concepts feel like they’re all firmly part of the Hidden World: Warden, Dhampir, Face, and Man in Black.

So what are the differences between those in the Hidden World, those in the modern world and the liminals in between? And should there be consequences for going too far one way or the other?

Suggestions for Liminal’s second edition

I know it’s early to be thinking about a second edition, but these are the things I would like to see in Liminal 2.0.

Core concept: Put the core concept at the front of the book! Liminal is a British urban fantasy rpg in which the players solve mysteries—this needs to be one of the first things you read (and not on page 63). I would also like to understand what the differences are between the modern world, the Hidden World, and those in between.

Character generation: Currently, Liminal character generation is mostly mechanical: focus, skills, traits. I would like to see links and bonds between the characters. Even the bare minimum of how did you learn about the Hidden World? and how did you join the Crew? would be a start. But I’d go further and include questions that bond the Crew together.

Crews: Crews are important in Liminal, and although we followed the process, we struggled with our Crew’s goal and purpose. The process system should spit out well-designed crews with compelling goals and purpose, so I think it needs looking at. And maybe a section on downtime would be worth including.

Factions: I would like to see each faction having goals and objectives (or maybe just rumours of these) to give them direction and bring them into conflict with each other. At the moment, they’re fairly static. How do they feel about the other factions?

Layout: While Liminal’s art is stupendous, the other elements of graphic design aren’t as powerful. The font is a little small and the lines are too long—which means it’s not easy to read (particularly for someone like myself in their fifties). Either have a gap between paragraphs or a first-line indent, not both. And the tables on page 33 and 41 could be more appealing. And I’ve mentioned stat blocks previously.

Skills and examples: More examples of things like social challenges (for example, intimidating and persuading) would help. We found that Lore was, without doubt, the most important skill—because it’s used both for casting magic and for general knowledge about the Hidden World, it gave the magic-using characters too much spotlight. Perhaps Lore needs splitting in two: Lore (knowing about the Hidden World) and Magic (using magic)?

A more thorough proofread: I found quite a few typos and inconsistencies. Is it Melee or Melee Combat? Hidden World or hidden world? Liminal could do with a more thorough proofread.

Enough Liminal for now

And that’s probably it for Liminal from me for a while. It’s been a fun thirteen sessions, but time to give something else a try.

 

The Lightless Beacon

As part of my plan to run other people’s RPG adventures, I thought I’d give Call of Cthulhu’s The Lightless Beacon a spin. It’s free on Roll20, which also means I get to practice my Roll20 GMing skills. And because I don’t have a copy of the Call of Cthulhu rules, I used Cthulhu Dark.

Spoilers ahoy!

The Lightless Beacon

The Lightless Beacon is an introductory adventure written by Leigh Carr with Lynne Hardy: the ship the investigators are travelling on is wrecked and the investigators must make their way to the nearest island (and lighthouse), which has its own difficulties (mainly deep ones).

The game is likely to end up with a furious battle at the top of the lighthouse, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing in most games, but less than ideal for Cthulhu Dark.

Timings for The Lightless Beacon suggest that it will be over in an hour, with four players. While it’s extremely short, I suspect my players will drag it out longer than that. But we’ll see.

Cthulhu Dark

Cthulhu Dark is Graham Walmsley’s excellent rules-light Cthulhu system. The rules cover two sides of A4, and I have the gorgeous hardback that Graham produced. I’ve written about it previously, and I find it simpler to use than traditional Call of Cthulhu. There are some complications in using Cthulhu Dark, though, that means I can’t quite run The Lightless Beacon exactly as written.

Doomed: In Cthulhu Dark, the investigators are doomed. They’re not expected to triumph. So this will not end well for my investigators—so I can ignore any temptation to have the investigators win.

No combat: Cthulhu Dark has no combat rules. If the investigators fight a supernatural menace, they lose. They can flee, or hide. But they can’t fight. So that rules out a climactic battle at the top of the lighthouse.

Final horror: In the scenario construction section, Cthulhu Dark talks about the final horror, that moment at the end of the adventure when the investigators finally understand the full ghastliness of what’s going on.

However, The Lightless Beacon doesn’t have a final horror—it’s just some monsters trying to recover their gold. So I changed the scenario slightly, and corrupted the deep one gold, making the gold itself evil. The deep ones turn their gold into jewellery and sell it to hapless victims who, upon buying it, become corrupted themselves (and maybe even prompting ‘the change’). I’m writing this before we play, and with luck the adventure will end with the investigators barricaded at the top of the lighthouse, monsters pounding at the door, and with one of them looking at her wedding ring, not knowing if it is tainted or not. Fade to black.

You can download the basic Cthulhu Dark rules for free here.

My thoughts on reading The Lightless Beacon

Roll20 doesn’t make it easy to use pre-written adventures. The text is contained in Roll20’s handouts, which I copied into Word for easy reading. I didn’t copy everything, and I still ended up with 6000 words of text…

So my first sense of The Lightless Beacon, a one-hour adventure is that it’s overwritten. By a long way. I appreciate that it’s aimed at newcomers to Call of Cthulhu, but I’m sure even newcomers would appreciate clear, concise writing.

Hard to use in play: This makes The Lightless Beacon hard to run in play—unless you’ve internalised everything (and why would you for a one-hour game?). Worse, the text doesn’t include the map cross-referencing, making it harder to use.

(I am sure you could present The Lightless Beacon as little more than annotated maps. It’s just a one-page dungeon, it doesn’t need all that extraneous material.)

Everything is hidden behind a dice roll: I was surprised at how much was hidden by a dice roll, including the handouts. Luckily, with Cthulhu Dark, investigators always find the clues so I don’t have to worry about that. But it does seem very old-fashioned and I had thought that 7th edition Call of Cthulhu, given GUMSHOE’s presence, had moved beyond that. (And maybe it does, maybe there’s something in the rules about that.)

Younglings: The monsters in The Lightless Beacon are embarrassing. They’re called ‘younglings’ a word that I’ve only ever heard in association with Revenge of the Sith. I’m not sure why they don’t have a more sinister name—sea horrors, or larvae. Anything but younglings.

Sea horrors (I’m not calling them younglings) have poisonous dorsal spines they can fire at prey. That means they have to turn their backs to attack anything! I’m trying not to laugh at how ridiculous that sounds, so I will give them breakable poisonous teeth instead.

Firearms: Games are scarier when the characters are powerless, and removing guns helps to remove that power. As far as I can see, The Lightless Beacon has three guns: two on the island, and one that starts with the characters. I removed (or broke) two, leaving the one gun for the investigators to find in the innards of a dead NPC. (Guns aren’t any help in Cthulhu Dark anyway.)

Dynamic lighting - bah

Roll20 integration: The Lightless Beacon is the first Roll20-sourced adventure I’ve run, and while it integrates with Roll20, I’m not sure it makes the best of Roll20. Some thoughts:

• Dynamic lighting: The plan of the lighthouse has dynamic lighting enabled, which is nice but I found it irritating in play. Once the players had visited a room I wanted that room to remain visible, but with dynamic lighting once we moved the token away the room went dark. (So I prefer the old-fashioned “fog of war” approach.) My lack of familiarity with Roll20 probably didn’t help here—I’m sure there’s a simple way to sort this.
• GM layer: The maps all have a GM layer with a few notes, but not enough. There’s a bloody stain on the GM layer in the kitchen—I’m not sure why that isn’t on the background as the investigators see it. And I would have liked more notes on the GM layer to make it easy to run.
• Scenario text: As a I said before, the scenario text is all in handouts. A quick reference guide would have been very helpful (or just better annotated maps).
• Roll 20’s Jukebox: I thought I’d try out Roll20’s jukebox feature. I used the Dark and Stormy track for outside scenes, and Existential Dread for inside scenes. (Both are by Tabletop Audio and I found them by exploring the jukebox.)

Actual play

Rotate the map?

So I ran the adventure with my regular players, Jon and Terry. They took the antiques dealer and marine biologist. Once they were on the island, they immediately sought shelter from the rain and went into the lighthouse cottage, ignoring my suggestion to explore outside. (In hindsight, I wonder if rotating the map so the investigators encounter the outbuildings first would have been better.)

They made a perfunctory scout of the cottage (ignoring everything interesting), before climbing the lighthouse itself to see if they could fix the light and prevent more ships from foundering on the rocks. 

So of course they encountered the grisly scene long before I had hoped they would.

They replaced the lighthouse lamp, but then I had the power go out. So they went out into the dark where they found the dead body there, and a generator that had shorted out. By this point they were aware of strange fish-horrors and shapes in the night, and didn’t want to hang around trying to fix the generator. So they holed themselves up in the windowless pantry, barring the door against Things Outside banging and scratching to get in.

By daylight the things had gone, and we ended the game with post-credit scenes for each character. The antiques dealer took the gold coins and was later murdered for them, while the marine biologist took the fish-thing specimen back but was discredited and became a laughing stock. So happy endings all around!

Both Jon and Terry enjoyed the simplicity and bleakness of Cthulhu Dark. They ended up with 3 and 4 Insight respectively, and I think the rule that a fight always ends in the Investigator’s death worked in the games favour. They were hiding from the creatures not trying to fight them.

We took about an hour and 45 minutes to play—so a good time (and as I suspected, longer than the hour advertised).

So what have I learned?

Roll20’s Jukebox: There’s not that much about Roll20 that I can’t get elsewhere, but I did like the jukebox. I’m not sure if the players enjoyed it as much as I did, but it worked for me.

Roll20’s GM layer: The Lightless Beacon introduced me to the GM layer, it’s not something I used before (I’m a Roll20 newbie). I can see me using that in future. (And as I said, I think The Lightless Beacon could be run from a good annotated map.)

Cthulhu Dark: Cthulhu Dark was just right. While I didn’t get the final horror I had hoped for, we had no stumbling over clues or missing anything because of a failed roll. And when they rolled 6, I enjoyed the challenge of finding a supernatural insight for them.

Other people’s adventures: I’m enjoying running other people’s adventures more than I thought I would. I still have yet to find one that really works—a compelling adventure properly laid out and concisely written so I don’t have to do so much homework to run it.

So all in all, a success.

Death in Venice

This is a catch-up post, mostly linking to other pieces I’ve written.

I ran Death in Venice recently (well, back in September). Death in Venice is one of our online murder mystery games, and as I had had nothing to do with this one (Mo did it all), I thought I’d discover what it’s like to both host a murder mystery and play in one.

TLDR; most enjoyable—more fun than I had expected, which was a very pleasant surprise.

Following this I ended up with a few blog posts elsewhere.

• Hosting and playing Death in Venice: My post for the Freeform Games blog.
• Simultaneously hosting and playing Death in Venice: And a similar post for my Great Murder Mystery Games website. These two posts are similar, but for slightly different audiences.
• Using Discord for online murder mystery games: How I set Discord up Death in Venice and The Karma Club for online play. Discord isn’t perfect, but it’s currently my favourite system for online larps.
• Casting a Freeform Games murder mystery game: I realised that, besides the game instructions, we haven’t provided any tips for casting our games, or the process we use. (Or at least, the process I used—Mo may do something different.) So that’s what this is.

Other People’s Adventures: The Haunting

Episode 2 in my experience of running other people’s adventures—this time Paul Mitchener’s The Haunting for Liminal which follows on from Prodigal Son. The Haunting didn’t need quite as much work as Prodigal Son, and I had fewer issues with the text. Some points though:

• The Ghost Spirit has the wrong trait (insubstantial instead of immaterial).
• It’s not clear, but I decided that P Division have asked for the police to keep bystanders away from Thornhill Hall.
• Where is Mark? At the end of the previous adventure, Mark Northcott is presumably reunited with his father. (This happened when I ran Prodigal Son.) I decided that Mark had left the house again and his whereabouts was currently unknown.
• The players may want to talk to witnesses or the press—I had a witness and reporter in my back pocket in case they were needed. (We used the reporter.)
• The social challenge to persuade the guardian spirit not to attack could be clearer—it’s an opposed roll, but using which skills? And at what level? (I said that it was a level 10 roll using Charm—but only by someone who can see the spirit.)

Countdown clock: I created a short countdown clock for the adventure:

1. Sir Tatton Northcott dies. Letter is delivered to Naomi. (This is where the players come in.)
2. Ghosts escape, the Thornhill Hall appears ghostly at night, there is an attack by a ghost. Police block access to the manor.
3. The newspaper publishes a report of the ghost attack “Mystery Assault at Thornhill Hall”
4. Charles Gardner sneaks into the ghost realm. Ghosts try attacking him, but Gardner sees them off and they keep him at bay.
5. Gardner finishes draining the energy - releasing the ghosts into the wider world.
6. P Division arrive, late as usual.

(I’m not sure if Gardner would be able to see off the ghosts in a fair fight, but I want Gardner to be tougher than the ghosts.)

On Geomantic Hauntings by Bishop Ferrar: I turned this into a handout (well, a Trello card) with the key information about draining geomantic energy taken from the text. That means the players can refer to it without me having to read it out. (There are a couple of other places where handouts might be useful—such as the press reports about the house appearing on the hill each night. This is the sort of thing that I think a published adventure should provide as a matter of course.)

Other Factions: And what of the other factions?

• P Division: Aware of the site, but are limited by what they can do and they arrive too late.
• The Council of Merlin: Aren’t interested in Thornhill, but I had one of them contact Naomi to secure the Northcott library for the council, using this as a bribe to help her reinstate her good name.
• The fae, werewolves and vampires: Uninterested in Thornhill (but they’d probably like access to the Northcott library).
• The press: Stories about the haunted house may attract cranks of all shapes and sizes from the ordinary world—so I had some ideas for those in my back pocket.

NPC stat blocks: Following Prodigal Son I changed the stat blocks as I found providing the different challenge levels slightly less intuitive than simply turning them into a modifier. So the Guardian Spirit became:

• Initiative modifier: +2 (Awareness)
• Attack modifier (melee only): +3 Poltergeist must spend 1 Will to act
• Attack modifier (Terror): +4, use Conviction for defence
• Defence modifier (melee/ranged): +3/+0 (magical or blessed weapons only - other weapons cannot harm it)

In practice I add the modifier to 8 to get the challenge level—when defending a melee attack, the PCs need to roll 11.

I did this to make it easier in the event that I have NPCs and foes battling each other: decide who is going to make the roll, then apply all the modifiers (attack and defence) to that single roll. 

How did it play: It took about two hours, and was pretty straightforward. I introduced a reporter character who followed the players into the ghost realm and I think caused them more problems than anything else. While there wasn’t much physical combat, there was a fair bit of magical combat this time and the players ended up very low on Will. Overall, a success.

Thoughts on running other people’s adventures

After running Prodigal Son and The Haunting, I have a few thoughts on running other people’s adventures:

• Running someone else’s adventure isn’t necessarily less effort than running your own. It does mean that you don’t need to generate a core story—but you do need to make it your own.
• Don’t forget that there’s no wrong way to play! (It can be harder to go off-piste when running a published adventure, particularly if you’re not that familiar with the setting.)
• If you’re preparing a published adventure, please really think about how it will be used in play. Solid blocks of text aren’t easy to skim while you’re running the game—bullet points, highlights, boxed text and handouts (with key player-facing info) are preferable. Both Prodigal Son and The Haunting could have been better thought out for actual use.

I plan to run more adventures, and I'm interested to see what I learn.

The Silbury Revelation

On my list of games to run is something set in Neolithic Britain, probably set on Orkney as there are so many fabulous sites within a few miles of each other (Maeshowe, Ring of Brodgar, Stones of Stenness, Ness of Brodgar—it’s an embarrassing feast of Neolithic riches).

The Ring of Brodgar (using Prisma)

This urge comes every now and again, normally around the time I visit any of these historic places. (I’ve been to Orkney twice, I hope to go again before too long.)

One thing I’ve struggled with is what Neolithic society was like. Obviously nobody knows what it was really like, but I’d like to present something that feels authentic. Unfortunately I’m not  good at doing real research, and after a week or so the urge passes and I get distracted by something that requires less effort.

But then I visit another stone circle and the idea returns.

Aside: It doesn’t help that I’m not sure what the game would be about. It would obviously be easy to do a monster-hunting game, but I’ve done that often enough that I’m not sure that’s where I want to go. I may instead start with something like Hillfolk, and see where that takes me.

Stonehenge, Avebury and Silbury Hill

So my thoughts about a Neolithic game returned to my mind recently after spending a few days in Wiltshire and visiting Stonehenge, Avebury, Long Kennet Barrow and Silbury Hill.

Yes-signed by the author!

Now, I haven’t done much reading about the Neolithic age. I’ve got a few of the English Heritage and Historic Scotland guidebooks, and I have the old Shell Guide to British Archaeology (and wow that’s out of date). But I don’t have an archaeology degree and I haven’t done the research. I find academic texts dull as ditchwater—I’m basically lazy and don’t want to put the effort in.

So I surprised myself when visiting Devizes recently by picking up (and enjoying) The Silbury Revelation by John Drews. (I will admit, the pretentious title did tickle me.)

Silbury Hill

To be honest, I’ve never found Silbury Hill terribly interesting. It’s a grassy hill, English Heritage doesn’t permit anyone to climb it, it doesn’t appear to contain any voids (so not a barrow or tomb), it almost collapsed a few years ago (thanks to incompetent archaeologists rather than faults with the original build), and it’s not astronomically aligned. It’s boring—but also a complete mystery.

Sibury Hill from the West Kennet Barrow layby

Except that John Drew, Avebury tour guide, has a theory…

Drew argues that Silbury Hill is an effigy: it’s the head of an Earth Mother hill figure, with Waden Hill as her body. It was designed to be viewed from the Windmill Hill enclosures (a Neolithic site older than and overlooking Avebury) and/or The Sanctuary, and/or Avebury itself (although the buildings in Avebury make that tricky to see). There’s a good illustration on this page of Silbury Hill and Waden Hill from the Sanctuary (and the Earth Mother hill figure shape is really obvious once it's been pointed out), but the text heads off in a different direction.

You can just see the Earth Mother hill figure in this screenshot taken from Google Streetview on Windmill Hill. Silbury Hill is to the right, with Waden Hill on the left. It's clearer if you click on the image or the link.

Drew argues that many Neolithic sites are aligned to hill figures and he lists several: Glastonbury Tor, Stonehenge (now hidden by trees), the Cheesewring and Hurlers on Bodmin Boor, Down Tor stone circle on Dartmoor (lots of hill figures on Dartmoor) and Maeshow on Orkney. Ah yes, Maeshow. More on that below.

One of the most famous hill figures is “sleeping beauty” at the Callenish Stones on Lewis (and another astonishing site). Sleeping beauty, a woman lying on her back, is formed by the hills in the distance. (She’s also known as the Old Woman of the Moors, and I found her hard to see—it’s a bit like seeing Jesus in burned toast.) And every 18-19 years there’s a lunar event where the moon rises from sleeping beauty’s breast and passes through the stones some hours later.

The Callenish Stones on Lewis

Anyway, back to Silbury Hill.

And even though we think we know what it’s for, why did they build it? (And when I say “we” I mean Drew. While he spins a good tale, I don’t know enough to say how convincing it is. It sounds convincing to me, but I’m a layman and don’t know any of the other arguments.)

So according to Drew, there’s a very similar hill figure not far from Avebury, consisting of Pecked and Woodborough Hill as viewed from Knap Hill (about 6km south of Avebury). And because the neighbours had a hill goddess, the owners of Avebury had to have one. “After all, the Kennet Valley people had the largest henge/circle complete with magnificent avenues, the largest hilltop causewayed enclosure and the largest long barrows in the land. Yet they did not have a truly striking landscape figure of their deity in keeping with the grandeur of their monuments. So they built one, and did their utmost to ensure it would last forever.”

So jealousy and arrogance. All very human.

Further research

Curiously, I can find no sign of Drew’s theory on the Internet.

Drew self-published The Silbury Revelation in 2015, but apart from references on Amazon and other bookshops, I can find no evidence that his theory has taken hold. I can’t even find anyone debunking it, and searches for hill figure results in the Cerne Abbas giant or chalk horses, which aren’t the hill figures I’m looking for.

So Drew’s theory doesn’t seem to have gained traction—I don’t know how much of that is because it’s complete poppycock, or Drew just doesn’t have much of an online presence. Or maybe my Google-fu isn’t as good as I think it is.

Aside: When does this pattern matching slide from respectable investigation into conspiracy craziness? There are clear similarities between finding hill figures in the landscape to searching for clues in an ARG (alternate reality game) or the QAnon conspiracy theory. These two articles (here and here) show how conspiracy theories are like games, and how satisfying it is to arrive at a theory that “fits the facts.” Is The Silbury Revelation any different?

Maeshow

Back to Maeshow and Neolithic Orkney.

Maeshowe is a famous Neolithic tomb, with a long passage facing the midwinter sunset and a large chamber with three smaller, slightly raised chambers off it. It’s famous for having lots of Viking graffiti, but for my purposes that doesn’t interest me.

Maeshowe plans from Orkneology.com

Maeshowe is strange for at least two reasons. First, it’s much more ornate than the other burial mounds and barrows in Orkney. Second, no actual burials have been found at Maeshowe (but maybe the Vikings cleared them out).

Like Silbury Hill, nobody knows what Maeshowe was for. But if I’m running set there then I need to know as the builders will be present.

In The Silbury Revelation, Drew argues that Maeshowe isn’t a tomb but is instead a temple for worshipping the death of the old year and the birth of the new. His two main arguments for this are that no burials have been found at Maeshowe, and that it has an Earth Mother hill figure of its own. That figure is formed by two hills on Hoy and is directly opposite Maeshowe’s entrance—the midwinter sun sets directly between them.

The Stones of Stennes-with Hoy's Earth Mother hill figure on the horizon

I have no idea if that was Maeshowe’s true purpose, but I think it’s interesting enough that I’ll adopt it for my game. There are plenty of other tombs and barrows nearby if I need to somewhere to bury someone important.

My thoughts on The Silbury Revelation

I enjoyed The Silbury Revelation. Drew tells and engaging story and while he presents what seems to be a compelling argument, I don’t have the expertise to argue otherwise. I think the ideas he presents have merit, but maybe if I knew more about it I would be casting it aside in disgust. But for now it suits my purpose.

My two key takeaways from The Silbury Revelation are:

• First, when I’m at a stone circle, I should look to see how it sits in the landscape. The stone circles are not positioned by chance, and are often precisely located (although they’re not always in their original location).
• Second, when I’m in a bookshop I should spend more time in the local history section. You never know what you will find…

And I want to visit more stone circles…

The rule of six

Taking a break from all this Liminal introspection, here are six re-reads that I’ve enjoyed recently. During the summer I continued to revisit my bookshelves (first batch here), so most of these are re-reads.

The End of the Matter, Alan Dean Foster.

To my surprise, I enjoyed re-reading this. I was a huge ADF fan when I was younger. I didn’t realise it at the time, but his ghost-written novelization of Star Wars got me into SF novels. I read it repeatedly. And then I read The Tar-Aiym Krang and I was introduced to the Humanx Commonwealth and Flinx and Pip (our hero and his pet minidrag).

My copy was published in 1979, and features a lovely Tim White cover. NEL published most of ADF’s fiction in the 70s and 80s, and they gave them a consistent look that made them stand out.

I had some reservations about returning to The End of the Matter, as recently I’ve not enjoyed ADF’s fiction anywhere near as much as I used to. But I was delighted to be proven wrong, and in re-reading I remember what drew me to SF (and particularly ADF’s Commonwealth): awe and wonder.

The End of the Matter is partly about Flinx’s quest to find his father, but mostly about a strange alien that Flinx picks up and an ancient alien weapon. This was what I liked about science fiction: exotic planets (Moth, Alaspin), spaceships, ancient temples, dead races with mysterious superweapons and more. And it turns out that I still like it.

The plot races along, and if I have a criticism of it it’s that the wonder of the ancient Hur’rikku device (capable of stopping a collapsar) is wrapped up in just one story—and so early in the series. It could easily have been a greater peril taking longer to resolve.

Starhammer, Christopher Rowley

Starhammer is a 1980s SF novel with an incredibly powerful weapon (the titular Starhammer) left in working order by a long-dead ancient race (unnamed). I’ve got a soft-spot for those… Anyway, in Starhammer humanity is under the cruel yoke of the alien Laowon. As is often the case in Rowley’s books, the book assumes that the reader is already familiar with the Laowon, and they are more shown than explained—which can be a culture shock. I couldn’t just fly through Starhammer, I had to re-read the occasional section as I realised I hadn’t picked it up the first time.

I noted before that earlier-age SF tended to be filled with decent, honest, trustworthy characters. Not so here. Like Rowley’s Fenrille series (starting with The War for Eternity), Starhammer is populated with cruelty and betrayal, and some thoroughly nasty characters.

I don’t think I have re-read Starhammer since I first read it (in 1987 I think). The story is okay, but it’s the first in Rowley’s Vang trilogy, and I’ve re-read the following books more than once. The Vang appears at the very end of Starhammer—it takes a more central role in the next two.

The Vang: The Military Form, Christopher Rowley

Set a thousand years or two after Starhammer, this time the Vang takes centre stage. Awakened from a deep sleep by a team of squabbling asteroid miners, the Vang quickly takes them over and launches an assault on the world below. Things quickly get out of control and the world (and the Vang) is eventually destroyed by nuclear fire.

The Vang is a wonderful creation. An “omniparasite” it takes over host organisms and changes and adapts them to suit. It shares gross similarities with the creature in Alien and the The Thing, and is as terrifying as it is disgusting.

The Vang: The Battlemaster, Christopher Rowley

The third Vang story, this is set 2000 years after The Vang: The Military Form, and another Vang survivor is awakened. This time it’s a Battlemaster, a much more formidable opponent than the Military Form, but also more subtle and not driven to serve the Higher Forms (which unfortunately hindered the Military Form in the previous book) in the same way. This time the adventure takes us to the Vang homeworld, which is finally destroyed when the Battlemaster sends the sun nova. 

As usual human society is corrupt and decadent, and if I had a complaint it’s that it doesn’t feel like 2000 years have passed as everything is pretty much the same as before. But that’s a minor quibble as I liked it a lot.

Darkest Day, Christopher Fowler

Before my re-read, I thought this was my favourite Christopher Fowler book—what’s not to love about a mad Victorian tontine driven by a mechanical device and zombies? But I found it slow and Arthur Bryant wasn’t quite as eccentric as he became in later stories.

I think I still prefer it to Seventy-Seven Clocks, which is the rewrite with the zombies taken out (I've read elsewhere that Darkest Day is supposed to be Arthur Bryant’s over-zealous reinterpretation of events in his memoirs). Darkest Day is in 1993 so no Internet and mobile phones are in their infancy (Arthur keeps losing his pager).

Blink, Malcolm Gladwell

Blink is (I think) the thinking fast bit of Daniel Kahneman’s Thinking Fast and Slow. (To my shame I’ve yet to read Thinking Fast and Slow, so I’m guessing here.) Anyway, Blink is all about the power of the human mind to make instant decisions—sometimes called gut reaction. I read it some years ago and I thought I’d give it a re-read. I’m glad I did—it’s thoroughly enjoyable.

As with most of Gladwell’s books, it’s well written and peppered with interesting anecdotes and studies. This was the first time I read about the supermarket jam test, and that test is one of many that has since proven difficult to replicate and that does make me wonder about some of the other stories in the book.

I had forgotten that Blink covers the implicit association test (IAT) for unconscious bias. That’s been a big thing at work in the last couple of years, and I remember taking a couple of IATs two or three years ago. (As I recall, I had no gender bias, but a little bit of racial bias. Which was sobering.) I must have read Blink over a decade ago, and I had forgotten that it talked about IATs.

There’s one anecdote in Blink that I hope has since had further research: Gladwell talks about a student who took the race IAT every day, and every day the result was the same: a bias towards white. Except one day he didn’t—and on that day he had been watching the Olympics and black athletes succeed. The suggestion was that seeing successful black role models helps create a positivity towards blacks. But an anecdote is not evidence, and maybe something else was going on. (Although either way, it’s hard to argue with positive role models.)

Other books

The above isn’t everything I’ve read recently—just the re-reads I’ve enjoyed most. I’ve also read a lot of other stuff (both good and bad). Here’s some of the books I enjoyed:

Rebel Ideas: The Power of Diverse Thinking by Matthew Syed. Excellent book about the benefits of diverse thinking and the dangers of “average”. Unsurprisingly, Rebel Ideas covers a diverse range of subjects—even dieting (in brief: everyone is different, no one diet works for all).

Artemis by Andy Weir. Set on the moon with our small-time criminal heroine caught up in a conspiracy. It’s okay, but every now and again goes into The Martian-style hard-SF problem solving, which never feels perilous as all the situations are made up anyway. (That was also true of The Martian, but that just did it better.)

The Deficit Myth by Stephanie Kelton. Argues that for a nation with their own currency (such as the US and UK and others), thinking of the national budget as you would a household budget is illogical. Unlike a household, a nation can print its own money (but not to excess—it needs to keep an eye on inflation). So if this book is right (and that’s a big if—and I don’t know enough to say either way), then the magic money tree does exist after all.

Head Hand Heart by David Goodhart. Not as good as The Road to Somewhere (which I talk about here) and covering the three different types of work (head = cognitive work, hand = technical/craft work, heart = care work) and how head work has become dominant in recent decades. Thought provoking.

Absalom by Gordon Rennie and Tiernan Trevallion. Excellent London-based police urban fantasy horror nonsense from 2000AD.

Brink Volumes 1-3 by Dan Abnett and INJ Culbard. Brilliant, and the only thing I really enjoyed when I re-subscribed to 2000AD a couple of years ago. Slow burn SF with a hint of Lovecraftian horror. Wonderful, with stylish art.

The Last Emperox by John Scalzi. The third and final book in the Interdependency series, and just as crazily treacherous and backstabbing as before. A great read, with wonderful dialogue.

Skills, RPGs and me

Liminal is a change for me: it has a skills list.

Since I re-started roleplaying in 2012 or so, I’ve been running very simple games: Fate Accelerated, Cthulhu Dark, and Monster of the Week. None use skills, and characters can do whatever is narratively appropriate.

So I’ve been running Liminal recently (see here for more on this) and I’ve often struggled to run it. What often happens is this:

• Player: “I puff my chest out and suggest to the reporter that he shouldn’t be here.”
• Me: “Okay, sounds like you’re trying to intimidate him. Make a roll”
• Player: “What skill do I use?”
• Me: “Erm, hang on…”

And then we all consult the rulebook and work out which skill we should use. And sometimes it’s not clear, so we have to make something up.

I find the simpler games much easier to GM:

• Player: “I puff my chest out and suggest to the reporter that he shouldn’t be here.”
• Me (Fate Accelerated): “Okay, that sounds like you’re being intimidating. That’s probably Forceful.” Make a roll…
• Me (Cthulhu Dark): “Sure, roll 1D6.”
• Me (Monster of the Week): “Sure, roll Manipulate Someone”

With a skill-based game I find I am spending too much time looking at the rules trying to work out how to interpret the player’s actions. I don’t have to look anything up in the other games.

Some of that is system mastery—but only some of it. While I’ve been playing and running Fate Accelerated for years now, as I have only run Cthulhu Dark once and Monster of the Week twice and I have no problem with them. Liminal is a more complex system and requires more system mastery. 

Isn’t it ironic?

It doesn’t escape my notice the irony in all of this: my first RPG was Traveller, followed by Call of Cthulhu and then GURPS. All skills-based systems, and all now more complicated than I can manage.

I’ve had a Traveller adventure sketched out for ages now, and one thing that is holding me back is whether to use the old Traveller rules (I have 1982’s The Traveller Book, but none of the modern iterations) or run it with Fate Accelerated. Using Traveller rules feels like hard work, while using Fate Accelerated feels like cheating. (But I suspect I would run a better game using Fate Accelerated.)

Looking forward

 As well as that potential Traveller scenario, I also want to run Alien and Fate of Cthulhu. Again, they’re skills-based systems (Fate of Cthulhu uses Fate Condensed, a halfway point between Fate Core and Fate Accelerated.)

I will be interested to see if I have the same problems with them.

Running Prodigal Son

And 3.5 hours later, we’re done running Prodigal Son. Sir Tatton is reunited with his son, Ariadne has the Knife of Lethe (yikes!) and our heroes took out two vampires.

Here’s how it went. Look out, spoilers ahead!

(Note, this is the third of three posts. Start here.)

First session

The session started at Northcott House in Sledmere where Sir Tatton asked the PCs to find his son and retrieve his books. There was a slight stumble when we discussed why the PCs would agree, but Sir Tatton was prepared to pay and we agreed that that was how it normally worked.

At the abandoned farmhouse (second scene) the PCs killed the two vampires (in two combat rounds—an enraged werewolf is really tough), rescued Omar and found the missing books, and directions to Castle Market in Sheffield.

In fighting the vampires, the difference between the fighters and non-fighters quickly became apparent. While Ygraine created the illusion of a sunbeam to distract the vampires, Naomi found herself sidelined. In future I will take a leaf from Fate’s book and allow characters to “create an advantage” (distracted, blinded by sunlight) that can be a +2 bonus by one of the combat specialists.

We ended the first session with the vampires dead.

Second and final session 

We started second session with a brief recap, and then the players questioned Omar and headed to Castle Market. (I had hoped they would return to their base in between as I had an encounter with a representative from the Council of Merlin planned to make this and the following scenario seem more interwoven, but it was not to be.)

At Castle Market the players met persuaded the two Jaeger watchers to show them around the site, and Ygraine created a distraction so they could sneak into the ghost realm.

In the ghost realm they confronted Mark, who handed over the knife for help in exiting the realm. As they returned to Castle Market, they encountered Ariadne and her brood (who had taken out the two Jaeger watchers).

Mark (minus the knife) launched himself at Ariadne, while the others face the vampires. Ariadne beats Mark, and the PCs trade the knife for Mark. Ariadne accepts, and lets the PCs leave. Mark is broken, and the PCs return him to Northcott Hall and Sir Tatton’s gratitude.

How was it running someone else’s adventure?

I’d thought about Prodigal Son so much (much longer than the 3.5 hours we spent playing it!) that I’d internalised it and running it wasn’t too hard. I found I had to create a lot of the detail (the names of the stolen books, how the knife worked, how you access the ghost realm). I don’t mind doing that, but I might have resented it if I’d paid for the scenario.

The situation at Castle Market could be clearer in Prodigal Son. I’m pleased I put the Jaeger watchers in as site security, as otherwise the PCs would have just gone straight to the ghost realm and bypassed them.

I had to think on my feet in the ghost realm. I was trying to decide how to play it—I knew Ariadne and her brood had to make an appearance. I was tempted to bring her into the ghost realm, but I was hoping she would survive the scenario as a potential future foe. (I hadn’t expected her to walk away with the knife—that was a nice surprise.)

I enjoyed running Prodigal Son. I would have written it differently, but I liked having a scenario that I could adapt and flesh out. It will be interesting to run a scenario that doesn’t require so much work.

And how was Liminal?

I found Liminal fiddly, but that may be my unfamiliarity with it. It’s crunchier than I am used to—my favourite system is Fate Accelerated and Liminal is much more granular. There are a few mistakes (a few errors made it through proofreading), and the writing could be clearer.

I’m not a fan of having both dice modifiers and Challenge Levels. If it were up to me, I’d have a constant Challenge Level of 8+, and then everything else is a modifier. (Page 199 explains how to set different Challenge Levels when climbing down the wall of a house—but it’s as easy to assign modifiers as it is to change the Challenge Level.)

The changes I made to the stat block (see this previous post) worked well, and really sped combat up as it saved everyone from having to work out what to roll during combat. However, it didn’t work so well when I had two NPCs fighting each other, so I've made tweaks.

I wasn’t familiar enough with Liminal to want to run a big combat with it, so I hand-waved the big fight with Ariadne and her brood. Luckily the players didn’t mind and were happy for me to take a more narrative approach (particularly one where they didn’t all die). Re-reading the rules, I’m not sure Liminal manages such battles well—there are rules for ordinary mobs, but a mob of seven vampires is somewhat different.

I’d like to see examples of social challenges in the rules. While a social challenge is an opposed skill test, it’s not clear which skills are used on either side. On at least two occasions I wished Liminal had a Persuade skill. It has lots of other social skills (Charm, Conviction, Empathy, High Society, Rhetoric, Streetwise and Taunt) but not Persuade.

Player feedback

Player feedback was good. They were invested in their characters, and they want to continue. They enjoyed playing a game set in Yorkshire (and one player knows Thornhill well).

Most players had a copy of Liminal, and two had played it before. I took a collaborative approach to running the game, asking them to look things up when I was busy.

What next?

I ended with the start of the next scenario (The Haunting), with a letter from Sir Tatton delivered to Naomi. However, that’s in the future and we will do some character stuff first. The PC’s drives are all from the book, and a lot of questions need answering (such as exactly why was Naomi’s master thrown out of the Council of Merlin?). So I asked the players to think about what they want for their characters.

I also want to bring in a few factions—so P Division will be interested in the bodies in the abandoned farmhouse, the Council of Merlin are already interested in Sir Tatton’s library, and Omar (the rescued werewolf) will join the Jaeger Family.

Plus I need to decide what to do about Ariadne and Mark Northcott…

Session Zero: Liminal Characters

Last time I talked about Prodigal Son and the changes I made to it. This time I’m talking about Session Zero and getting ready to play. I recruited my players Liam, Thomas, Alex, and Daniel from GoPlayLeeds (which hasn’t met this year due to lockdown).

Although I was using the four pre-generated characters from the Liminal rulebook, we spent 45 minutes in Session Zero getting to know them.

For me, the most important bit of an RPG character isn’t their statistics, skills or attributes—it’s the relationships with the other characters and the world. Like most RPGs, Liminal doesn’t cover this well so this is what I did.

Crew questions

The “Crew” is one of the most important parts of Liminal. The Crew is Liminal’s equivalent of the adventure party. It’s the group that ties the PCs together. 

Liminal is a game of solving cases (at least, that’s what the published scenarios so far would have you believe). And so the PCs need a good reason to be motivated to investigate and solve those cases, and that’s where the Crew comes in. The Crew’s reason for existence is to allow the PCs to solve cases.

A Crew can be many things—such as an investigation business, a group with a powerful enemy who have banded together for protection, or group allied to a faction who provides support in exchange for services. (I do think Liminal’s section on creating a Crew could be stronger, but that’s a subject for another day.)

I wanted the players to have some ownership in the crew, so I use this to frame a discussion:

Crew Concept: Who you are and your reason for taking on cases and engaging with the world.

• An investigation business.
• A group with a powerful enemy who have banded together for protection.
• A group allied to a faction or powerful individual who provides support in exchange for services.

Crew questions: Why does the Crew investigate cases? How do clients get in touch? Who formed the Crew? Is it an established Crew, or formed with the PCs? Is being part of the Crew full-time? Does the Crew have a reputation?

We had an interesting discussion about the Crew. Was it the day job, or is it on top of the day job? We decided that each player could decide. We liked the idea that the Crew could provide deniable services, and that it would have a patron.

The group chose several assets, including a base below the Impact! Art Brigade art collective in Leeds.

Character questions

We then moved to the character questions:

• How did you join the Crew?
• Which faction to you admire, and why?
• Which faction worries you, and why?
• With which faction do you have a positive relationship, and why?
• With which faction do you have a negative relationship, and why?

The question about admiring and fearing factions revealed interesting views that the PCs had—and a common admiration of the Queen of Hyde Park. I’m sure she’ll be pleased.

Contacts

Finally, I asked each to choose a contact from the list below (or they could invent their own) and determine their relationship and how trustworthy they are. I almost always do this in my games as I find it so useful as a GM: it gives me a ready supply of NPCs linked to the players that I can use to create drama and provide information.

• Michael Fraser, young magician being groomed for greatness by the Council of Merlin. (Academic Wizard)
• Mina Cotton, not the frail old lady she appears, but a formidable fae knight loyal to the Queen of Hyde Park. (Knight)
• The Deacon, leader of a fae criminal game, loyal to the Winter King. (Clued-up criminal)
• Meera Stone, untrained wizard who married into the Jaeger family. (Gutter mage)
• Lynden Grant, bodyguard to the Order of St Bede (Bodyguard)
• John Cooper, P-Division liaison officer (Investigator)
• Jet, pavement artist and street urchin with links to The Mercury Collegium (Changeling)

What is your relationship to them?

• Childhood friend
• Lover
• Immediate family - spouse, parent, sibling or child
• Distant family - uncle or aunt, grandparent
• Flatmate
• Colleague
• Team player
• Schoolmate / university friend
• Mentor or teacher
• Rescuer
• You share an interest
• You shared an experience

How strong is your relationship? 

• I trust them with my life
• I can rely on them in a time of trouble
• I owe them a favour
• I find them unreliable at best

We ended up with a friend, a couple of mentors and an unreliable lover. One of them already appeared in our opening session, and I’m looking forward to working the rest into the story.

Session Zero Feedback

Player feedback was that they appreciated the chance to explore their characters before diving straight into the case. The challenge I have is to make sure I keep drawing on the Session Zero material we go along—I know I have to work at that.

Next time: running Prodigal Son.

Running other people’s adventures: Prodigal Son (Liminal)

This is the first in what may be a series of my thoughts in running other people’s adventures. As I've mentioned, it’s not something I normally do as I prefer to run my own. So this is a departure for me, and I’m probably overthinking it.

(As this has ended up being three posts long, I'm definitely overthinking it...)

This time it’s Liminal’s Prodigal Son, written by Sheffield’s own Dr Mitch (and Liminal author).

Spoilers ahead!

Making it my own

Prodigal Son is a short, three or four scene case for Liminal. The Crew are given a case, fight vampires, and enter a ghost realm. There’s more to it than that, but that’s the broad outline.

In terms of running the adventure, I need to make it my own. So I printed it out and went through it, making notes as I did. And as I did, I realised that I had a handful of questions I needed to resolve so the case made sense.

I am sure I could have asked the good Dr Mitch for his thoughts on these, but I’m sure he’s got better things to do than answer my pedantic questions. More important, answering the questions myself gives me some ownership. It means I will internalise it more, making it easier for me to run.

So, I have questions…

Why doesn’t Sir Tatton realise who took his books?

Sir Tatton has noticed that some books have gone missing from his library—but his guardian spirit didn’t react to the thief and it would react to anyone other than a family member. As the players will immediately put two and two together (because they’re playing an RPG if for no other reason) and work out that Mark Northcott took them, it makes sense for Sir Tatton to know that as well.

So when I ran it, Sir Tatton knows that his son took books from his library (he doesn’t know how many). Prodigal’s Son doesn’t name the books, but the players will probably ask, so I made them up: A History of Sheffield Castle, Wolf Legends, and Bronze Age Myths.

The books aren’t mentioned again, but I dropped them in the ruined farmhouse that the Heirs of Osbehrt use for their base. If the vampires wipe everyone out, then they’ll take the books back to Ariadne (but if that happens then it means the investigation is already over). If they don’t then they’ll end up in the hands of the players—which is as it should be.

What was the deal between the Mark and Ariadne?

Before the case begins, werewolf Mark Northcott has made a deal with vampire Ariadne. His gang (the Heirs of Osbehrt) are being pressured by the Jaeger family to join them, and they want to remain independent. So Mark makes a deal with Ariadne to put the Jaeger family “in their place”. (I imagine this is done by Ariadne killing the Jaeger Face that has been negotiating with the Heirs—that saves me inventing a character…)

But what does Ariadne get from the deal? The case notes don’t say, so here’s what I decided:

• In return for protection, Northcott offered Ariadne a powerful ancient knife he knew he could get.
• Northcott had no intention of giving Ariadne the knife (the Knife of Lethe). Instead he intends to use to raise the Wolf’s Head, which he can use to see off both Ariadne and the Jaeger family.
• When Ariadne realises that she has been tricked (she has access to Diviners), she attacks the Heirs, trying to find Northcott and the knife.

What are the watchers doing and do the watchers know about the ghost realm?

Jaeger watchers

Prodigal Son isn’t clear what the two Jaeger watchers are doing in Sheffield. They’re watching… but how? Are they in a car, just hanging around, or do they have some kind of cover? Do they run a nearby newsagent? I made them security guards for the derelict site, which adds to their nerves (they are nervous because they know Ariadne and her gang are around) because they can’t just leave.

And do they know about the ghost realm? While the adventure suggests no, I decided that one of them does.

(And I renamed one of them—Sean Daley is also the name of Sir Tatton’s butler in The Haunting and if all goes well I’ll run that next.)

What happens if Mark Northcott raises the Wolf’s Head?

And what of the Wolf’s Head, the mythical werewolf outlaw gang that Mark Northcott is trying to raise? What happens if he succeeds? What does that look like? Prodigal Son is silent, but it feels like an own goal not to summon the Wolf’s Head, so…

Knife of Lethe: If the wielder of the knife kills another being, then they draw the spirit of the Wolf’s Head into them. This costs 2 Will and happens automatically unless they don’t have enough Will. 

This gives them +2 Melee, +2 damage and +4 Endurance. However, it also drains 2 Will.

A wielder may do this multiple times, providing they have enough Will. Each time they kill, the spirit of the Wolf’s Head gets stronger and they get more powerful. The effect lasts until the following sunset—at which point the wielder drops unconscious for 48 hours. (And given this may fall into the players’ hands, there’s probably some awful long-term effect if the knife is used often.)

What is Ariadne’s plan

I decided I needed a countdown clock for Prodigal’s Son—events that will take place whether the players are present or not. It all hinges around Ariadne…

1. Ariadne’s vampires attack the Heirs, but Mark is no longer there. (At this point the PCs enter and thwart their final attack.)
2. Ariadne tracks Mark to Castle Market in Sheffield.
3. Ariadne kills one of the Jaeger watchers and tortures the other to learn about the ghost realm.
4. Ariadne and her gang enter the ghost realm.
5. Ariadne and Mark fight—Mark wins, using the knife to kill one of Ariadne’s vampires and summons the Wolf’s Head into himself. He becomes the legendary Wolf’s Head and destroys Ariadne. As he continues to kill the vampires he becomes more and more powerful—but loses more and more Will. By the end of the fight he has no Will left, and eventually passes out.
6. With no Will remaining, Mark fades and becomes a ghost in the ghost realm himself...

Why are Mark’s stats so high?

Finally, for someone who has been in a ghost realm, Mark’s stats need adjusting so I dropped his Will to 6 (from 12). I also found his drive, vengeance at all costs, confusing as I wasn’t sure who he wanted vengeance on. The Jaegers? Ariadne? So I changed it to Summon the Wolf's Head and make the Heirs of Osbehrt great which is clearer in terms of gameplay and his objective for the scene.

Can I make fights more interesting?

Recently I talked about using scenario design to make the fights better. As Prodigal Son has several potential fights, I considered how I might make those more interesting.

The vampires: Prodigal Son’s first battle is with some vampires picking on a young werewolf. That’s their objective—if outmatched they will flee and report back to their boss, Ariadne. (And if they can’t flee, they will surrender.)

Ariadne and her brood: Ariadne plans to be a player in the Hidden World, and will not risk her life foolishly. Her brood isn’t indispensable either—so she will retreat and regroup if things don’t go her way. (She may not even attack if the odds aren’t in her favour.)

Mark Northcott: Sadly, Mark has gone crazy and is driven by his lust for power. He wants to summon the Wolf’s Head. He will fight to the death.

Next: Session Zero

Even for a one-shot I like to do some Session Zero stuff, and I’ll cover that next time.