Updating Seeds of Doom

I’ve updated The Seeds of Doom with a few things I’ve enjoyed in my games lately.

The Seeds of Doom is a one-shot mystery for Monster of the Week. It’s set in a seaside town, which could be anywhere but is based on my home town of Sidmouth in Devon.  I’ve run it a couple of times before and while it’s been okay, there are a few things I can do to improve it based on recent games.

Changes to the mystery

Stealing from ALIEN: I like the random attacks that the creatures make in ALIEN, as it shakes things up. So I’ve added that to the monster attacks in The Seeds of Doom (although I’ve simplified it by given them three attacks instead of six).

Stealing from Brindlewood Bay: I like how Brindlewood Bay uses questions to help set the scene for different locations. So I’ve done that for The Seeds of Doom: ‘What can you see here that shows that the owners enjoyed gardening and were proud of their garden?’

(Yes, I could just ask those questions anyway, but I find the prompts useful and perhaps if I do it enough then it will become a habit.)

Changes to the playbooks

Monster of the Week is ideal for campaign play, but I find the playbooks are over-complicated for a one-shot. So I’ve made a few changes.

Luck: I found that luck as written didn’t work. I imagine it’s a great doom track in campaign play, but I found it didn’t work for a one-shot. So I’ve changed Luck to being a simple re-roll of the dice (rather than an automatic success) and allowed it to refresh following a refreshment scene (stolen refreshment from Lady Blackbird).

Mark luck to re-roll the dice or avoid all harm from an injury. [] You can refresh your luck by having a refreshment scene with another character.  A refreshment scene is a good time to ask questions (in character) so the other player can show off aspects of his or her PC. Refreshment scenes can be flashbacks, too.

Experience: I’ve dropped experience to three boxes from five, so there’s a chance that the PCs may get two chances to level up. I’ve also limited the experience choices to additional moves and higher stats, to keep things simple.

Amending the playbooks: I’ve made a few changes to the playbooks that I’m using:

• Structure: I don’t understand how MotW’s playbooks are ordered. They make no sense to me, so I’ve restructured them by bringing the ‘Getting Started’ section forward in the character sheet.
• Weapons: As I set The Seeds of Doom in England, I’ve removed some heavier weapons and firearms from the playbooks.
• Curated moves: I’ve removed some moves that won’t be appropriate for a one-shot or The Seeds of Doom, so players don’t accidentally choose them.

I’m not using all the playbooks. For example, for The Seeds of Doom I’m not using The Chosen or The Divine as they have a big impact on the game and are better suited for longer form play.

You can see my playbook changes here.

Questions for team start

I will also use a few questions to help form the team, such as:

• Who founded your team?
• Where is your team’s base?
• How are you funded?
• Are you ‘official’ or ‘unofficial’
• If unofficial, what influence do you have to ensure cooperation with officials?

Did it work?

Yes! I recently re-ran The Seeds of Doom and I was happy with all of the changes. We had a great refreshment scene, and the change to luck worked well.

You can download The Seeds of Doom from my Itch.io page—pay-what-you-want.

And my website contains other RPG stuff--scenarios, larps and more.

Cosmic Encounter and me

Cosmic Encounter is one of my favourite boardgames. It may even be my favourite boardgame, but I probably need to play it more than I currently do to make sure.

(This isn’t a review—you can find reviews aplenty on boardgamegeek.)

Early Cosmic

I started playing Cosmic Encounter in 1981 or so. I had just begun roleplaying (Traveller), and the advert for Cosmic Encounter in Games Workshop’s catalogue caught my eye. Once it arrived, I was hooked. We played it incessantly—both with my RPG buddies (in and around games of Traveller) and my ‘normal’ school friends.

The penultimate week of the school year was ‘project week’. We had the opportunity to do exciting things like youth hostelling or parachuting. One topic, generally reserved for those that couldn’t afford the exciting projects (or weren’t able to get into the popular projects), was boardgames. This was the early 80s and I was miles away from the nearest games shop. Boardgames meant Monopoly, Escape from Colditz, Cluedo and its friends. (Even the Spiel des Jahres was in its infancy and wasn’t something I’d learn about for a few years.) Anyway, I chose (yes, chose) boardgames for two years and brought in Cosmic Encounter for the week. I mention all this because I remember one girl who was clearly not happy to be playing boardgames; but there was one game she would play: Cosmic Encounter.

Which alien is best?

Before I started buying expansions, I tracked the success of the aliens. To my surprise, Philanthropist was the alien most likely to win. This alien lets you give a card to your opponent—which means you give away your rubbish cards and keep your good ones. It also means you draw more cards—something that would become known as ‘card advantage’. So over a decade before Magic: The Gathering popularised the term, Cosmic Encounter taught me the importance of card advantage. Since learning that, I’ve always preferred powers that let me draw cards, and shied away from those who hoard their hands.

The second most successful alien was the most obvious candidate: Virus. Virus multiplies its attack card, and is strong in challenges. But not as strong overall as Philanthropist. 

Third, I think, was Laser. Last was Clone—I’ve never liked Clone (probably because I like drawing cards). Clone only works if you’ve got an encounter card you want to keep, and it means that you’re rarely drawing new cards and so miss out on Artifacts (or Edicts as they were known then), Flares and other goodies in the deck. I wouldn’t inflict Clone on a new player either—it’s not fun enough and doesn’t sell the craziness of Cosmic Encounter at its best. (It’s okay as a second power in the right combination, which is why I haven’t thrown it out.)

My favourite power, though, is Sorcerer (you may switch cards) as I love the delightful mind tricks it creates. (Sadly I don’t play the new aliens enough to know if I have a new favourite.)

I liked the hex boards—they set Cosmic Encounter apart from the other boardgames of the time. And changing to a regular board was one of several things that Games Workshop did horribly wrong with their version. But as much as I liked the hexes, I prefer Fantasy Flight’s planet design. Definitely the best.

Expansions and other editions

It wasn’t long before I had all the Eon expansions, including the weird hexes. Despite having all the expansions, we didn’t play them much (besides the extra aliens and 5th and 6th players). Moons were too silly and slowed the game down. (I’m not a fan of expansions that slow games down for little return.) Lucre wasn’t exciting enough, and the alternate hexes weren’t that good—although we used the alternate cone and Praw a fair bit.

I bought the awful Games Workshop edition and was disappointed with the mess they made of it.

I didn’t get the Avalon Hill edition, but I bought Mayfair’s Simply Cosmic (which disappointed me as it didn’t have enough of the craziness I craved).

In the deep freeze

Then I stopped playing.

I moved away from home and didn’t get a regular boardgame group until after the renaissance started in the 90s. So while Settlers of Catan and Magic: the Gathering became popular with my roleplaying group, Cosmic Encounter remained in my cupboard, unplayed.

Since 2000 I have probably played more boardgames than ever—but, sadly, Cosmic Encounter has not been amongst them. There have, I think, been a few reasons for this:

• Until the Fantasy Flight edition, the only copy I had that was worth playing was an ancient Eon copy full of expansions held together with sticky tape. Cosmic Encounter had to compete against newer games with their better graphic design, and Cosmic Encounter lost.
• Gameplay has improved since Cosmic Encounter came out. When it was first released, Cosmic Encounter compared favourably to Monopoly and Cluedo. Now it must compete against Ticket to Ride, Carcassonne, Wingspan and others. Unsurprisingly, Cosmic Encounter sometimes shows its age.
• I have learned that an hour is my preferred length for a boardgame. I normally don’t want to play a single game for much longer than that—that should be enough to give you a good, solid game and still have time to play something else later on. (Also an hour often suits real-life commitments.) Cosmic Encounter, unfortunately, often takes longer than that. Even longer if you are introducing new players. (I don’t mind setting aside longer for a good game, but an hour often works for the casual gamers I usually play with.)
• The learning curve for Cosmic Encounter is steep, especially if you add all the craziness (which is how I like to play). However, without the craziness (and if your new players haven’t got into the spirit of it), Cosmic Encounter can be a bit pedestrian.

Three player Cosmic Encounter—with two players

But I still want to play. 

Unfortunately, Cosmic Encounter doesn’t appeal to Mrs H, but luckily Megan is happy to play. So I created a dummy player for three-player Cosmic Encounter, which we play now and again. It’s not as good as a full player, but it’s better than nothing.

The dummy player always has a mandatory power and draws encounter cards from the deck (it has no hand). I created a deck of cards for the dummy player’s decisions—how many ships to commit, asking for allies, whether to ally when invited, and whether to make a deal. Other decisions (such as where ships are taken from or which planet to attack) are usually obvious and agreed among the players. The dummy player has been known to win before now...

Favourite boardgames

Recently I thought about my favourite boardgames (which currently include Glory to Rome, Dominion, Oceans, Wingspan—and Cosmic Encounter) and noticed that I like games with variety. Games with lots of stuff that let you do different things—I like a game that forces you to make the best of what you’ve got and work for the win.

Do I like Cosmic Encounter because I like those kinds of games, or do I like those kinds of games because I like Cosmic Encounter?

House rules and variants 

Cosmic Encounter has always seemed a game that encourages house rules, and I’m no different. So these are my house rules.

If you’ve got a vacant planet in your system (ie, completely empty with no colonies), then you can colonise it for free when moving your ships (from the warp, or returning from a successful defensive alliance, or whatever). I’ve always played this way—because it’s always more fun to have the use of your alien power than not to have it.

I don’t use the Fantasy Flight rules for the cone (or gate). As per the original Eon rules, defensive allies always go on the ring on the cone, while offensive allies sit with the attackers in the mouth of the cone. (Okay, that’s not really a house rule, just me refusing to move with the times.)

One thing I don’t like about the new edition is the scoring tracker. Partly that’s because it can take up so much space, especially if everyone is on the same score (although I could put the scoring tokens on top of each other). Also, I don’t always remember to move the scoring track as colonies are won and lost. Mainly, however, I remember the delight (or frustration) of winning (or losing) Cosmic Encounter because we had not paid attention, and a player already on four colonies was asked to ally with the attack. The scoring track makes it much easier to keep an eye on who is in the lead, making those delicious sneaky victories much harder.

Cosmic Encounter and the future

So I think that’s about it—Cosmic Encounter and me.

Going forward, one thing I haven’t explored is playing Cosmic Encounter online using Tabletop Simulator. Perhaps that’s something to explore.

Aiding in RPG combat

So we were playing The Troubleshooters and were in the middle of a fight. We had four PCs, but one of them had already been taken out. We faced a formidable NPC bad guy and her mooks. And it wasn’t going well for us.

Unfortunately for us, only one character was good at combat. As it wasn’t me, I decided to take a leaf from FATE’s book and help our fighter, somehow. So I asked the GM if I could distract the bad guy by picking up a trifle and throwing it at her.

Not to do damage (I already knew that would be hopeless), but to give my friend a bonus when it was his turn to attack.

Unfortunately, nothing in the rules suggested we could do such a thing. We were in combat, and my options (from the rules) were:

Move

Free actions

• Say something
• Pick up something
• Drop something
• Ready a weapon
• Change weapon
• Break cover
• Fall Prone

Main actions

• Sprint
• Attack
• Catch your breath
• Reload
• Take cover
• Survey
• Delaying your main action

Alas, throw trifle at someone to distract them, wasn’t on the list. Not even a generic some other action or distract enemy or help a friend, which might have allowed such nonsense.

(Quick aside. While I play and run lots of freeform larps, I have only played actual-combat boffer-larp once or twice. I don’t like sword fighting, and I’m not good at it. But I remember I was most effective when I attacked enemies that were already engaged in fighting. They couldn’t focus easily on two opponents (Darth Maul is a force-boosted exception), particularly if we attacked from opposite sides. So even though I was rubbish, by flanking I either had an unprotected side or back to attack, or I distracted my opponent for my more-skilled colleague to deliver the killing blow.)

The GM’s role?

Now, you could argue that’s what the GM is for—to mediate the player’s chaotic ideas.

But I’ve noticed that detailed rulesets tend to inhibit such improvisation. I don’t know why that should be, but I’ve seen it both with GMs ruling and with players simply rolling dice to hit. (As a player, I’ve been inhibited myself as this story about D&D shows.)

In my example above (with the trifle), the GM agreed and gave the other PC a bonus to hit. 

(It didn’t help, unfortunately—and even had he hit, the NPC would have had a dodge roll followed by rolling damage. I so much prefer FATE—I would have created an advantage which my PC could have used to not only improve his chances of succeeding but also increase the damage inflcted. Ah well.)

Aiding in combat

Putting aside the challenge of improvising while playing/running detailed rule systems for a moment (or another post), are there other games that let you help in combat?

Picking some games from my small library…

In FATE, even if you have no combat skills, you can create an advantage that someone else can invoke during the fight. You might flank them, throw sand in their eyes, distract them by throwing a trifle at them, shine a light in their eyes, upset them with insults or whatever else you can think of.

Mongoose’s Traveller has a catch-all miscellaneous action in combat. It would be nice if the examples included helping another PC, but it’s better than nothing.

ALIEN and Liminal both include rules for helping or assisting others in a task, although neither includes that in their list of combat actions.

One of the basic moves in Monster of the Week is Help Out—which gives a bonus to another PC’s move (and is exactly what I was doing with that trifle).

While Cthulhu Dark has rules for helping, it also rules that if you fight the monsters you die!

So in summary, a mixed bag.

Improvising in detailed systems

For me, much of the joy of roleplaying comes from improvising and doing all those things you couldn’t do if you were playing a computer RPG. And yet I still find myself inhibited when faced with a detailed rule system—if the rules don’t say you can do it, you can’t do it.

And yet, you can.

You just need to ask.

Social skills in RPGs

I’ve recently been playing Fate Condensed, The Troubleshooters and ALIEN and noticed something odd about social skills.

While combat skills are usually straightforward—melee and shoot (or variants thereof), social skills are ridiculously complicated. 

Examples from some RPG rulebooks I have close to hand:

RPG	Combat skills	Social skills
Fate Core and Fate Condensed	Fight, Shoot	Deceive, Empathy, Provoke, Rapport
The Troubleshooters	Melee, Ranged combat	Charm, Subterfuge
ALIEN	Close combat, Ranged combat	Manipulate, Command
Liminal	Melee, Shoot	Charm, Conviction, Empathy, Rhetoric, Taunt
Traveller	Gun Combat, Melee	Carouse, Deception, Diplomat, Leadership, Persuade
Trail of Cthulhu	Firearms, Scuffling, Weapons	Assess Honesty, Bargain, Cop Talk, Flattery, Interrogation, Reassurance
Call of Cthulhu	Fighting, Firearms	Charm, Fast Talk, Intimidate, Persuade, Psychology
Tales from the Loop	None – no fighting	Charm, Lead, Empathise

Traveller also has Gunnery (for ship combat) and Heavy Weapons (for artillery). And when it comes to melee, Trail of Cthulhu separates armed (Weapons) and unarmed (Scuffling) melee combat. I’m not sure why it needs to do that.

So it feels like we know what we want with combat: hitting and shooting things.

With social skills, however, we’re all over the place. And while there are a lot of similarities (several examples of Charm/Rapport), systems often have their own peculiarities, such as Traveller’s Leadership (used during combat) and Trail of Cthulhu’s Cop Talk or Reassurance.

I want to think that the skills are chosen to reflect the way the designer expects the game to be played. I suspect that’s why something like “Assess Honesty” is in Trail of Cthulhu: it’s important to know when you’re being deceived.

However.

Thinking back to recent games, the social skills I’ve most often wanted are persuade, intimidate or deceive.

You can argue that charm and provoke/taunt are different styles of persuasion. (Do they need to be separate skills? I don’t know.) And intimidation is arguably just a type of persuasion (that’s how Traveller treats it).

But it feels to me that some games specialise too far—I’m not sure what the value of Rhetoric is in Liminal. And Call of Cthulhu has both Charm and Persuade. What did playtesting show? When was Rhetoric used? Were Charm and Persuade used equally and for different things?

Because characters have a limited pool of skill points, numerous social skills makes characters less effective: skills will be spread more thinly.

I’m not sure I have an answer or a conclusion. Other than were I designing a skills-based RPG, I’d have a good long look at my skills list.

As for me, I will pay more attention to my social dice rolls, record what skills I need, and revisit this subject.

More classic science fiction re-reads

I’ve been going through more of my old SF books lately. So here’s a roundup of the latest.

Spinneret

Spinneret by Timothy Zahn. I enjoy Timothy Zahn’s writing—I remember enjoying his Star Wars novels (before the expanded universe became unmanageable). And I enjoyed his Cobra series and others. Spinneret is from 1985, an era where SF authors still imagine music coming on cassettes. It’s full of aliens, scheming humans and mysterious alien artefacts--and a dead alien race who tried to camouflage their sun from predators. And failed.

But that’s about it. It’s okay, I’ve taken an idea from it for a freeform I’m writing, but I’m not going to keep it.

Three to Conquer

Three to Conquer by Eric Frank Russell is a 1950s science fiction tale of a telepath battling aliens from Venus. Our hero is a telepath—the only one on Earth. And he accidentally encounters three people with alien minds—the Venusian baddies. Half the book is about getting the authorities to believe him; the rest is tracking down the aliens. Still enjoyable, and I’m still going to keep it.

The Forge of God

For the second time, I struggled with The Forge of God by Greg Bear (1987). That’s both because while I like Bear’s ideas, I find his writing heavy-going. Anyway, aliens destroy the world in The Forge of God. However, the story doesn’t make that much sense—before they destroy the world (dropping neutronium bombs in the Earth’s core), they appear as three different alien groups, each with a different story. But I’m not sure why they would do this—we don’t have the technology to prevent the end of the world, so why waste effort creating confusion? What was the point? Towards the end, good aliens (metallic spiders) save some people for the sequel, which I haven’t (and won’t) read. Not a keeper.

The Mote in God’s Eye and sequels

The Mote in God’s Eye by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle. This was one of my all-time favourite SF novels, and it’s still excellent after all these years. The Moties are brilliant (still one of the best, detailed and truly alien aliens in SF), but the Empire of Man now feels very creaky and wrong. The Mote in God’s Eye was written in 1971; my observations from 2022:

• Only one female character in the entire book. Yes, most characters are in the space navy, but I guess equality hadn’t landed in 1971.
• The technology was mostly okay (and mostly in the background), but I spotted a photograph on a desk at one point. Oh, and a hilarious space telegram STOP. 
• The Empire of Man is very aristocratic, with Dukes, Barons, and Lords in power. For science fiction, it feels like space in the 1800s.
• The Alderson drive, whereby fixed jump points between stars facilitate star travel, still feels new and unusual. So physics determines where jump points form (and where they go to), and you can’t jump hither and thither like you can in most other SF universes. 

The Gripping Hand is the excellent 1993 sequel. (It would be more excellent if I had the UK edition which has the better title: The Moat Around Murchison’s Eye). I think I must have read this just the once before, as I remember it being rubbish—slow to start and not enough Moties. I have no idea where I got that from—I found it gripping this time. (Maybe last time I didn’t read it soon enough after reading the first one?)

Anyway, The Gripping Hand addresses many issues with the first book—there are female characters, the Empire of Man doesn’t feel quite so anachronistic, the technology isn’t so out of date (no space telegrams, thank goodness). Also, I liked how the sequel dovetailed into the original, despite being set 25 years later.

Unfortunately, I then tried to read Jennifer Pournelle’s follow-up, Outies. Outies’ writing style didn’t suit me. So that’s twice I’ve tried to read it, and twice I’ve given up. Ah well.

ALIEN: Perfect Organism design notes

 I have written a scenario for Free League’s ALIEN roleplaying game, called Perfect Organism. 

Knowing how my brain works, that probably means I’ve scratched that itch, and I may be done with ALIEN. If so it will join Achtung! Cthulhu, Liminal and The Dee Sanction in the pile of games I’ve enjoyed but am unlikely to run again. We’ll see.

Anyway, here’s how the scenario came about.

More investigative, less shooty

So far I’ve run Hope’s Last Day, Chariot of the Gods and Destroyer of Worlds. (The links go to my reviews and reflections.)

I found Destroyer of Worlds too heavy on combat for my liking and knew I wanted a more investigatory game.

But an investigation into what?

Tied to the movies

I wanted to do something tied to the movies—more than simply reusing the xenomorphs and Weyland-Yutani. And of the movies, only Alien and Aliens interest me—I was disappointed in all the films after that. I’ve seen them, of course, but they never caught my imagination the way Alien did. (And Aliens, to a lesser extent.)

I’ve often wondered what happened after Alien. My impression is that the company diverted the Nostromo to intercept the distress call. (I am unsatisfied by the explanation that every company ship contains special order 937, and encountering the beacon was just chance.) So how did they know, and what did they do when the Nostromo disappeared?

So there’s a scenario there. But I didn’t want to stray too far from the canon, and the ALIEN rpg is set after Aliens and Alien3. 

But what about the Sulaco?

What did the USCMC do when the Sulaco didn’t return from LV-426?

And that gave me the basis for the scenario.

Perfect organism

The title came from Ash’s “Perfect organism” line in Alien (repeated by David in Alien: Covenant). For an android, the xenomorph really could be a perfect organism—it predates humans and leaves synthetics alone. And the line made me wonder if there was a secret android rebellion. (Is David recreating it to overthrow his human masters?)

And if there is a secret android rebellion, maybe that’s motivation for one character. (This is probably where I’ve gone furthest off-canon, certainly regarding the movies.)

(Perfect Organism is also the name of a wonderful podcast dedicated to the Alien saga. If you’re an Alien geek, it’s heaven.)

A room full of facehuggers

Back in 1979, before I saw Alien (I was too young to see it at the cinema the first time around), most of the pre-publicity photographs showed the facehugger, but nothing else. The facehugger is creepy—and elegant. It’s wrapped around Kane’s head, doing something. The camera dwells on it; we have plenty of time with the facehugger.

(Later movies don’t do the facehugger justice. Aliens showed them moving, yes, but we’ve not spent time with someone who has been facehugged since the first movie.)

As I was developing ideas for the scenario, I had a vision of a room full of bodies lined up on operating tables, each with a facehugger. While I didn’t use that exact vision, I kept the idea of bodies with facehuggers—only I put them in cryotubes instead.

Characters

I decided on five characters: two members of the investigation team (a USCMC major and an ICC lawyer), their company minder, the captain of the spaceship they’ve hired, and the scientist in charge of Kathar Station. 

(Oh yes, Kathar Station. I found Kathar Station in the ALIEN rpg book—although it is called Odobenus at one point.)

All the characters have conflicting agendas. While the published scenarios so far normally have one or two characters with very secret agendas, all my characters will rub up against each other. Hopefully, this will bring them into conflict. If I’ve done my job right, the players will proactively drive the action as they react to events.

(In many ways, this is almost a tiny freeform. A freeform-tabletop rpg hybrid?)

Events and Acts

Cinematic games have acts, so tension can’t only come from the PCs. It also needs external events—in this case, a combination of escaped xenomorphs and a hostile spaceship.

The acts in ALIEN drive characters’ agendas—as events unfold, the characters’ objectives can change. I found that in writing these, they were more focused versions of the original agenda—adjusted, given the new information.

The Coyote approaching LV-426 by Steffan Guldevall 

As for events, I realised that I needed to inject some outside interference to create the acts. So while I hope the players will create much of the drama, I’m adding tension in the form of a hostile ship on approach and a planetside facehugging operation that has gone wrong.

I find the events in the published scenarios somewhat overwritten and hard to improvise around. So the events in Perfect Organism are bullet points for the GM to expand as they see fit. (I know this isn’t for everyone—it’s already been suggested that I should flesh the bullet points out.)

Making it easy to run

I spend a lot of time on this blog talking about how published adventures aren’t easy to run (see here for the summary), so I’ve tried to make Perfect Organism easy to run. At least, easy for me to run. So I’ve repeated a few essential rules, such as:

• The radiation rules (because of the radiation cloud created by the explosion at the end of Aliens)
• Fire rules with the incinerator units
• Synthetic rules for the secret android.
• Story points and Stress for each player.

If you play a lot of ALIEN, you can ignore this. However, if you play a lot of systems as I do, it helps to have relevant rules to hand when you need them.

I also worked out the base to-hit rolls for anyone with a weapon to save me from working them out in the heat of battle.

Rules and layout changes

There are a few things about the standard ALIEN rules and layout I don’t like. So I made changes.

Stat blocks: The standard ALIEN stat blocks omit key information, and don’t make it clear which skill works with which attribute. I’ve talked about this before, and I’ve made it clearer in Perfect Organism. (Again, if you play ALIEN frequently, it’s not a problem. But I don’t understand why Free League penalises new players.

NPC stats: I haven’t given the NPCs the “proper” stats. Instead, I’ve given them “Scientist: 7 dice” or “Starship Captain: 8 dice”. So when the technician NPC does something technician-y, the GM just rolls their dice. All NPCs have an “Other” rating (usually three dice) for rolls outside of their speciality. I find that simpler and easier.

Story points: I am more generous with Story Points—players can earn up to two by either having a refreshment scene with another character or by taking actions to further their agenda. (A refreshment scene is roleplaying—I took it from Lady Blackbird.) Players can spend story points to change the result of a single die they have thrown or reduce their Stress Level by two.

Rivals and buddies: I dropped rivals and buddies for Perfect Organism—the character backgrounds explain everything they need to know about the other characters.

Format and layout

I asked for feedback on Reddit, and as a result, Jonathan Pay helped me with the final layout—it looks much better now. In addition, Jonathan created the cover image using Wombo.art.

I used Steffan Guldevall’s Hepatica class deckplans for the Coyote, which I found on the ALIEN RPG Facebook group. I contacted him and he kindly allowed me to include them in the game—he also created an image of the Coyote approaching LV-426 that I’ve used.

And a playtest?

And at some point I will run it myself, possibly at Furnace.

Fate of Cthulhu #3: Episodes 5-8

Okay, back to Fate of Cthulhu. See here for my broad pre-game overview, and here for sessions #1-4. I had hoped to post this sooner, but we lost a few sessions due to real life.

Recap

So, the TL;DR from last time: Our heroes (Roman played by Terry and Kaspar played by Jon) are trying to prevent the rise of Great Cthulhu. They have stolen a key cult artifact but haven’t worked out how to destroy it yet.

#5 The thing in the idol

In Arkham, the PCs rented a storage locker where they could store their kit and experiment with ways to destroy the idol.

Terry had the bright idea of dissolving the idol in hydrofluoric acid. So they bought a plastic tank and some hydrofluoric acid and dropped the idol into it to see what happened. (I didn’t roleplay collecting all this—I may have asked for a Fate point for them to have it all conveniently available. I don’t know how easy it is to buy hydrofluoric acid in the US, but I imagine it’s a controlled substance.)

After a while, this appeared, completely unfazed by the acid.

And so now the players must deal with a Cthulhu skin parasite! (This is picture of a lobopodian I grabbed while the players were chatting.)

As well as working out what to do with the idol, the PCs investigated bytes and bodies. To draw out cultists they put the idol on Ebay (this was before they dissolved it in hydrofluoric acid). They also met, and befriended, Dr Agatha Manderley (Dean of the Miskatonic School of Occult Studies).

#6 The ritual

Finally, the PCs destroyed the idol and the thing in it. Dr Manderley found The Eye of Light and Darkness, a ritual that banished/warded evil things. (Thanks Masks of Nyarlathotep!) So the PCs cast that (spending quite a few Fate points in the process) and finally destroyed the idol/creature, finishing the first mission.

While the PCs survived the backlash from the spell, Dr Manderley wasn’t so lucky. When she recovered, she discovered that she now had a Yithian passenger in her mind…

We finished the session sorting out advancement and milestones, and I worked out what changes had been made to the timeline. There’s a process for this—it could be clearer, but I think I figured it out. Overall the PCs succeeded with two positive ripples and one negative ripple.

The way this works is you apply them to other missions, and a + means something is better than you thought (so I’ve decided Dr Manderley will be more helpful and survives longer than in the original timeline) and a - means something is worse.

#7 The junction box

The PCs made good progress on bytes and bodies and located the hacker’s lair by pretending to be an IT security company and approaching the New York financial institution mentioned in the briefing. They offered to recover the ransom for 50%. The institution said yes.

The PCs did this through a combination of Rapport and Deceive. I first made them spend a Fate point to have everything they needed to look like a business, then Jon used Rapport to create a good first impressions aspect that Terry invoked for his Deceive roll. With success with style, the PCs were rewarded with all the detail they needed—namely, the junction box that the IP address had been traced. From there, some legwork got them to the hacker’s lair.

On this occasion, skills worked better than approaches as Rapport and Deceive worked well in tandem. This wouldn’t have been so intuitive with Fate Accelerated’s approaches. Sneaky probably replaces Deceive, but what would Rapport be replaced by? Clever? Flashy? Sneaky again? It’s not so clear. 

We ended with the PCs staking out the hacker’s lair—we should finish this mission next time.

#8 The hackers

We end bytes and bodies with a fight in the hackers’ lair. There’s more of them, and they have a Ghoul, but they’re only NPCs and it isn’t long before the PCs have vanquished the bad guys and destroyed all the servers.

As we started the session I realised I needed a picture of the hackers. I had just been watching The Big Bang Theory, so that’s who I based the hackers on: Sheldon, Leonard, Howard, Raj and Penny. Sheldon was the lead hacker, obviously.

This session was mostly combat—and it turns out that Fate of Cthulhu uses popcorn initiative. We’d decided to use popcorn initiative before checking what the rules said, so it was nice to be playing run-as-written for a change.

Jon really leant into the murder-hobo aspect of Fate of Cthulhu. His character put a bullet through the brain of the lead hacker (Sheldon), and once the others had been dealt with and helped wreck their IT kit, he executed them. As part of the major milestone that happens after a mission is completed, we added murderous to his key concept.

I’m happy with how combat went—it felt like Fate, with aspects and burning Fate points to get results.

One hacker (Penny) got away, disappearing down a Ghoul tunnel. I have no idea if we will see her again.

We ended that session with the hackers dealt with, their lair and IT destroyed, and a copy of the Necronomicon in the PC’s possession. I’ve updated the timeline (a positive ripple for the resistance, this time) and next time we start a new mission.

So what do I really think of Fate of Cthulhu?

We’ll take a break now to return to a previous game and pick Fate of Cthulhu back up later in the year. So here’s what I think of Fate of Cthulhu so far.

Core concept: While the idea of Terminator v Cthulhu sounds great, it turns out to be much more murder-hobo-y than any of us had expected. When I think of The Terminator I think of Reece and Sarah Connor battling the Terminator—I don’t think of it from the Terminator’s viewpoint. But that’s exactly what we have.

This may be the nature of the Cthulhu apocalypse, but in every case you’re stopping something, or killing someone or blowing something up. And given how big the stakes are (preventing the end of the world), the PCs shouldn’t lose sleep over killing a few people to avoid the apocalypse. (Quantum Leap, this isn’t.) That’s a challenge for us, as we’re all in our fifties, and our murder hobo days are long behind us. So it’s taking some getting used to.

The missions: The missions themselves are fine. They would be better if they were a little clearer, but there’s just enough detail to work with (and they’re loose enough to improvise with). They need to be flexible because as the campaign progresses and the players change things, ripples in the timeline mean that things will change. I expect the final mission could be very different, depending on how the earlier missions fare.

One thing I appreciate about the missions is that they make it clear what the players have to do (although there is often a twist). That means we can skip the initial what-is-going-on part that you get in a lot of investigations and focus on the solution instead. That feels like a win to me.

Fate Condensed: As is probably clear, I struggled with Fate Condensed’s list of skills. (I have concluded that I’m not a fan of skill-based systems). The rest of Fate Condensed is fine, although sometimes I think we’re too old-school to play Fate ‘properly’. But we enjoy it, so that’s fine. And, of course, there’s no wrong way to play.

Am I going to run Fate of Cthulhu ever again?

I want to finish this short campaign to prevent Cthulhu from rising (or at least make it less-worse). But after that, I doubt I’ll run it again.

While I enjoy running it, it’s too murder hobo-y for my liking. We’ll get to the end, but once we’re done that will be it. I have so many other games I want to try.

Next time

Next time we finish Fate of Cthulhu.